Monday, January 24, 2011


Am I losing it? Or are these not some pretty adorable kids shoes? Joe and I saw them in a store window the other day and the only thing that stopped me from buying a pair was that I thought their smallest size (4/5) was actually for a 4-5 year old and not an infant. I guess I'm going to need to figure this stuff out quick. Anyway, Joe totally made fun of me and said that they're not cute at all. I know that pregnancy makes your brain do weird things, but I thought his words were a little harsh and I don't really care what he says because I LOVE them. They're like Crocs' way cooler sibling. I actually wouldn't mind getting a matching pair in the adult version. And I'm not for matchy-matchy AT ALL. Oh, and the colors they come in are to die for.

11 comments:

  1. i dunno.

    i *kinda* see the appeal... the colors, the shapes...

    but i might have to be team joe on this one. but less extreme.

    ReplyDelete
  2. They're definitely better than Crocs but I'm not totally sold. The colours are awesome, though.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I'll be honest - kids can get away with almost anything, shoe wise (tiny, tiny feet = hard to make not-cute). But please resist the adult version. Although your feet are pretty tiny, so you'd have a much better chance at getting away with it than I would.

    ReplyDelete
  4. awww, man! i am getting served here. maybe it is the colors that sold me? maybe you just have to see them in person?

    ReplyDelete
  5. I honestly don't know! The colors are beautiful. Well, they could be practical for gardening or things like that (I hope that you are not mad!!!). Again, lovely colors ;)

    ReplyDelete
  6. Sorry Celia. I think Joe's right. The colours do look nice and teeny tiny anything looks cuter than the big sizes. But no. Sorry :)

    ReplyDelete
  7. oh geez! let's just forget i ever wrote this post, guys. :/

    ReplyDelete
  8. the colors are great. and if the feet are tiny than they are adorable! i vote yes.

    ReplyDelete